Tennessee’s attorney general, Jonathan Skrmetti, will face off against challengers in the U.S. Supreme Court to defend the state’s ban on gender affirming care for minors. Skrmetti argues that the 2023 law was enacted to protect children from risky and unproven medical procedures. The plaintiffs, represented by ACLU and Lambda Legal, claim that the law violates equal protection under the Constitution and infringes on their rights to make medical decisions for their transgender children.
The legal battle has drawn attention to the issue of transgender rights and access to healthcare treatments across the country. Supporters of the ban argue that lawmakers have the authority to regulate medical practices involving controversial social issues, while opponents fear that restricting access to gender affirming care will harm transgender youth.
The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for transgender rights and medical decision-making. It remains to be seen whether the Supreme Court will uphold the precedent of equal protection under the law or allow states to restrict access to healthcare treatments based on gender identity.
Source
Photo credit kansasreflector.com
.jpg "Only two presidents have not used their pardon power due to circumstances beyond their control.")
